Worked solution: Maynard's multidimensional sieve: bounded gaps between primes (2013)
Since is roughly proportional to and to , the ratio between them — maximized over all reasonable choices of — becomes the single number that decides how many primes among can be forced to appear. Call this best possible ratio .
The bigger is, the more primes Maynard's method can guarantee inside a bounded-length window of size . Everything now hinges on how large can be shown to be for suitable — a calculus-of-variations question with no primes in sight anymore.
For a fixed level of distribution and small , Maynard defines , the supremum taken over the class of suitable smooth functions (Maynard 2013, §4, Proposition 4.2). Setting in the counting sum from Step 2, a short computation with the asymptotics from Step 4 shows for all large , so — following the logic of Step 2 — infinitely many have at least of prime.
This is Maynard's Proposition 4.2, and it is the crux of the whole method: bounded prime gaps of size inside an admissible of length follow automatically once one exhibits, for that , a smooth making the ratio large enough. In particular (two or more primes among the shifts) already gives a bound on , namely the diameter of any admissible -tuple realizing it.
So the entire analytic-number-theory problem has been converted into: find, for a suitable , a good enough . The next step supplies exactly that, via explicit test functions and numerical optimization.
- Variational problem
- A problem of finding the function (here, of variables) that maximizes or minimizes some quantity built from it (here, the ratio ), rather than finding a single optimal number.