The Black–Scholes equation, via Itô's lemma
Statement
Suppose the stock price follows geometric Brownian motion , and let be the no-arbitrage price of a derivative paying a function of at maturity. Then must satisfy .
Why is it true?
Ordinary calculus says the change in comes only from and . But jitters randomly, and Itô's lemma shows that this randomness feeds back into through an extra term built from the second derivative — a correction with no analogue in ordinary calculus. Once that extra term is accounted for, a portfolio that holds the derivative and exactly the right amount of stock can be made completely riskless, and a riskless portfolio can only earn the risk-free rate .
Proof sketch
Apply Itô's lemma to , treating as a smooth function of the random process and of time. It states . Unlike ordinary calculus, an extra term appears, coming from the nonzero quadratic variation of Brownian motion.
Now build a hedged portfolio , holding one derivative and short shares of stock, with chosen to be . Its change is . Substituting the expression for and , and choosing , the random terms and cancel exactly.
What remains is , a purely deterministic (riskless) change over the instant , with no dependence left on the stock's drift .
A riskless portfolio must earn exactly the risk-free rate, or an arbitrage would be possible by borrowing or lending against it. So . Equating the two expressions for and dividing by gives , which rearranges into the Black–Scholes equation.
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Fischer Black, Myron Scholes (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities · DOI:10.1086/260062
- John C. Cox, Stephen A. Ross, Mark Rubinstein (1979). Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach · DOI:10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1
- Steven E. Shreve (2004). Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models