MathLabs
TheoremProved

Classification of closed surfaces

Statement

Every compact connected surface without boundary is homeomorphic to exactly one of: the sphere S2S^2; a connected sum of g≥1g \geq 1 tori (an orientable genus-gg surface, χ=2−2g\chi = 2-2g); or a connected sum of k≥1k \geq 1 copies of the projective plane RP2\mathbb{RP}^2 (a non-orientable surface, χ=2−k\chi = 2-k). No two surfaces on this list are homeomorphic to each other.

Why is it true?

However twisted or crumpled a closed surface looks, cutting it up and reassembling it topologically always yields either a plain sphere, a sphere with some number of handles glued on (donuts stacked on a ball - a torus, a two-holed torus, and so on), or a sphere with some number of Möbius-band twists sewn in (which can't be embedded in ordinary 3D space without self-intersection, like the Klein bottle or the projective plane).

Proof sketch

Triangulate the surface, then cut it open along a spanning tree of the triangulation's dual graph to obtain a single polygon whose edges are identified in pairs according to a word in the edge labels (such as aba−1b−1aba^{-1}b^{-1} for the torus). A sequence of elementary cut-and-paste moves on this polygon (relabelling, cutting along a diagonal and regluing) reduces any such word to one of the standard forms a1b1a1−1b1−1⋯agbgag−1bg−1a_1b_1a_1^{-1}b_1^{-1}\cdots a_gb_ga_g^{-1}b_g^{-1} or a1a1⋯akaka_1a_1\cdots a_ka_k, which identify the surface as a genus-gg orientable surface or a connected sum of kk projective planes.

Topics that use this theorem

Related theorems

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. William S. Massey (1991). A Basic Course in Algebraic Topology
  2. George K. Francis, Jeffrey R. Weeks (1999). Conway's ZIP Proof