MathLabs
TheoremProved

Hellinger–Toeplitz theorem

Statement

Let TT be a linear operator defined on the entire Hilbert space HH (not just a dense subspace) that is symmetric, meaning ⟨Tx,y⟩=⟨x,Ty⟩∀x,y∈H\langle Tx,y\rangle=\langle x,Ty\rangle\quad\forall x,y\in H. Then TT is automatically bounded.

Why is it true?

This is the theorem that explains why unbounded operators are unavoidable in quantum mechanics: physically important symmetric operators like position, momentum, and the Hamiltonian genuinely cannot be defined on every vector of HH (only on a dense domain), because if they were, this theorem would force them to be bounded — but they demonstrably are not.

Proof sketch

We use the closed graph theorem (a standard consequence of the Baire category theorem): a linear operator defined on all of a Hilbert space is bounded if and only if its graph {(x,Tx):x∈H}\{(x,Tx):x\in H\} is closed in H×HH\times H, i.e. whenever xn→xx_n\to x and Txn→yTx_n\to y, we must have y=Txy=Tx.

Suppose xn→xx_n\to x and Txn→yTx_n\to y. We must show y=Txy=Tx. For any fixed z∈Hz\in H, symmetry gives ⟨Txn,z⟩=⟨xn,Tz⟩\langle Tx_n,z\rangle=\langle x_n,Tz\rangle for every nn.

Taking n→∞n\to\infty on both sides: the left side ⟨Txn,z⟩→⟨y,z⟩\langle Tx_n,z\rangle\to\langle y,z\rangle because Txn→yTx_n\to y and the inner product is continuous; the right side ⟨xn,Tz⟩→⟨x,Tz⟩\langle x_n,Tz\rangle\to\langle x,Tz\rangle because xn→xx_n\to x. So ⟨y,z⟩=⟨x,Tz⟩=⟨Tx,z⟩\langle y,z\rangle=\langle x,Tz\rangle=\langle Tx,z\rangle (using symmetry once more on the right).

Since ⟨y,z⟩=⟨Tx,z⟩\langle y,z\rangle=\langle Tx,z\rangle holds for every z∈Hz\in H, we get ⟨y−Tx,z⟩=0\langle y-Tx,z\rangle=0 for all zz; taking z=y−Txz=y-Tx gives ∥y−Tx∥2=0\|y-Tx\|^2=0, so y=Txy=Tx. The graph of TT is therefore closed, and the closed graph theorem concludes TT is bounded.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Michael Reed, Barry Simon (1980). Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis
  2. John B. Conway (2000). A Course in Operator Theory
  3. Werner Kirsch (2008). An Invitation to Random Schrödinger Operators · arXiv:0709.3707