Put–call parity
Statement
For a European call and put on the same non-dividend-paying stock, with the same strike and maturity , and a constant risk-free rate : , where is the stock price at time .
Why is it true?
A call plus enough cash to grow into by maturity, and a put plus one share of stock, are just two different ways of guaranteeing you end up holding exactly one share worth at time . If two recipes always produce the same dish, they must cost the same today.
Proof sketch
Build two portfolios today, at time . Portfolio A holds one call option plus an amount of cash invested at the risk-free rate, so that it grows to exactly by time . Portfolio B holds one put option plus one share of the stock.
Compare their values at maturity in the two possible cases. If : the call is exercised and worth , and the cash has grown to , so Portfolio A is worth . The put expires worthless, and the stock is worth , so Portfolio B is worth . The two portfolios agree.
If : the call expires worthless, and the cash is still worth , so Portfolio A is worth . The put is exercised and worth , and the stock is worth , so Portfolio B is worth . The two portfolios again agree, this time both equal to .
So in every possible outcome, Portfolio A and Portfolio B have exactly the same value at . If their values at differed, an arbitrageur could sell the more expensive portfolio, buy the cheaper one, invest the difference at the risk-free rate, and at collect a risk-free profit regardless of what the stock does. Since real markets do not allow such riskless profit to persist, the two portfolios must have the same price at : , which rearranges to .
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Fischer Black, Myron Scholes (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities · DOI:10.1086/260062
- John C. Cox, Stephen A. Ross, Mark Rubinstein (1979). Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach · DOI:10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1
- Steven E. Shreve (2004). Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models