MathLabs
TheoremProved

Put–call parity

Statement

For a European call and put on the same non-dividend-paying stock, with the same strike KK and maturity TT, and a constant risk-free rate rr: C−P=S−Ke−r(T−t)C - P = S - K e^{-r(T-t)}, where SS is the stock price at time t≤Tt \le T.

Why is it true?

A call plus enough cash to grow into KK by maturity, and a put plus one share of stock, are just two different ways of guaranteeing you end up holding exactly one share worth max⁡(ST,K)\max(S_T, K) at time TT. If two recipes always produce the same dish, they must cost the same today.

Proof sketch

Build two portfolios today, at time tt. Portfolio A holds one call option plus an amount of cash Ke−r(T−t)Ke^{-r(T-t)} invested at the risk-free rate, so that it grows to exactly KK by time TT. Portfolio B holds one put option plus one share of the stock.

Compare their values at maturity TT in the two possible cases. If ST≥KS_T \ge K: the call is exercised and worth ST−KS_T - K, and the cash has grown to KK, so Portfolio A is worth (ST−K)+K=ST(S_T - K) + K = S_T. The put expires worthless, and the stock is worth STS_T, so Portfolio B is worth 0+ST=ST0 + S_T = S_T. The two portfolios agree.

If ST<KS_T < K: the call expires worthless, and the cash is still worth KK, so Portfolio A is worth 0+K=K0 + K = K. The put is exercised and worth K−STK - S_T, and the stock is worth STS_T, so Portfolio B is worth (K−ST)+ST=K(K - S_T) + S_T = K. The two portfolios again agree, this time both equal to KK.

So in every possible outcome, Portfolio A and Portfolio B have exactly the same value at TT. If their values at tt differed, an arbitrageur could sell the more expensive portfolio, buy the cheaper one, invest the difference at the risk-free rate, and at TT collect a risk-free profit regardless of what the stock does. Since real markets do not allow such riskless profit to persist, the two portfolios must have the same price at tt: C+Ke−r(T−t)=P+SC + Ke^{-r(T-t)} = P + S, which rearranges to C−P=S−Ke−r(T−t)C - P = S - Ke^{-r(T-t)}.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Fischer Black, Myron Scholes (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities · DOI:10.1086/260062
  2. John C. Cox, Stephen A. Ross, Mark Rubinstein (1979). Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach · DOI:10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1
  3. Steven E. Shreve (2004). Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models