Stokes' theorem
Statement
In classical vector calculus, let be an oriented piecewise smooth surface with positively oriented boundary curve and unit normal , and let be a continuously differentiable vector field on a neighborhood of . Then . In its general differential-form formulation, for any smooth oriented -dimensional manifold-with-boundary and any compactly supported smooth -form on , .
Why is it true?
Imagine tiling a surface with a fine mesh of tiny oriented loops, all circulating in the same counterclockwise sense. The curl at each point measures the microscopic circulation of around one tiny tile. When you add the circulations of all the tiles together, every interior edge is shared by two adjacent tiles that traverse it in opposite directions, so all interior contributions cancel out in pairs. Only the unshared outer edges along the boundary survive, leaving the macro-circulation . Seen as , it says that integrating the exterior derivative of a form is dual to taking the boundary of the domain.
Proof sketch
Using a smooth partition of unity subordinate to an oriented atlas of , decompose so that it suffices to prove when is compactly supported inside a single coordinate chart modeled on or the upper half-space . Writing , its exterior derivative is . Applying Fubini's theorem and the one-variable fundamental theorem of calculus along each coordinate , the terms vanish because has compact support, while the term on evaluates at the boundary to match with its induced orientation.
Topics that use this theorem
Related theorems
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Michael Spivak (1965). Calculus on Manifolds: A Modern Approach to Classical Theorems of Advanced Calculus
- Victor J. Katz (1979). The History of Stokes' Theorem · DOI:10.1080/0025570X.1979.11976770