MathLabs
TheoremProved

Stokes' theorem

Statement

In classical vector calculus, let S⊂R3S \subset \mathbb{R}^3 be an oriented piecewise smooth surface with positively oriented boundary curve ∂S\partial S and unit normal n\mathbf{n}, and let F\mathbf{F} be a continuously differentiable vector field on a neighborhood of SS. Then ∬S(∇×F)⋅n dS=∮∂SF⋅dr\iint_S (\nabla \times \mathbf{F}) \cdot \mathbf{n}\,dS = \oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r}. In its general differential-form formulation, for any smooth oriented nn-dimensional manifold-with-boundary MM and any compactly supported smooth (n−1)(n-1)-form ω\omega on MM, ∫Mdω=∫∂Mω\int_M d\omega = \int_{\partial M} \omega.

Why is it true?

Imagine tiling a surface SS with a fine mesh of tiny oriented loops, all circulating in the same counterclockwise sense. The curl (∇×F)⋅n(\nabla \times \mathbf{F}) \cdot \mathbf{n} at each point measures the microscopic circulation of F\mathbf{F} around one tiny tile. When you add the circulations of all the tiles together, every interior edge is shared by two adjacent tiles that traverse it in opposite directions, so all interior contributions cancel out in pairs. Only the unshared outer edges along the boundary ∂S\partial S survive, leaving the macro-circulation ∮∂SF⋅dr\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r}. Seen as ∫Mdω=∫∂Mω\int_M d\omega = \int_{\partial M} \omega, it says that integrating the exterior derivative of a form is dual to taking the boundary of the domain.

Proof sketch

Using a smooth partition of unity subordinate to an oriented atlas of MM, decompose ω=∑kρkω\omega = \sum_k \rho_k \omega so that it suffices to prove ∫Mdω=∫∂Mω\int_M d\omega = \int_{\partial M} \omega when ω\omega is compactly supported inside a single coordinate chart modeled on Rn\mathbb{R}^n or the upper half-space Hn={x∈Rn:xn≥0}\mathbb{H}^n = \{x \in \mathbb{R}^n : x_n \ge 0\}. Writing ω=∑i=1nfi(x) dx1∧⋯∧dxi^∧⋯∧dxn\omega = \sum_{i=1}^{n} f_i(x)\,dx_1 \wedge \dots \wedge \widehat{dx_i} \wedge \dots \wedge dx_n, its exterior derivative is dω=(∑i=1n(−1)i−1∂fi∂xi)dx1∧⋯∧dxnd\omega = \left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} (-1)^{i-1} \frac{\partial f_i}{\partial x_i}\right) dx_1 \wedge \dots \wedge dx_n. Applying Fubini's theorem and the one-variable fundamental theorem of calculus along each coordinate xix_i, the terms i<ni < n vanish because fif_i has compact support, while the i=ni = n term on Hn\mathbb{H}^n evaluates at the boundary xn=0x_n = 0 to match ∫∂Hnω\int_{\partial \mathbb{H}^n} \omega with its induced orientation.

Topics that use this theorem

Related theorems

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Michael Spivak (1965). Calculus on Manifolds: A Modern Approach to Classical Theorems of Advanced Calculus
  2. Victor J. Katz (1979). The History of Stokes' Theorem · DOI:10.1080/0025570X.1979.11976770