MathLabs

Worked solution: Marcus–Spielman–Srivastava proof via interlacing families (2013)

Step 1 of 8: From an infinite-dimensional operator question to Weaver's KS2KS_2
In plain words

In 1959 Richard Kadison and Isadore Singer asked a question about listening posts on an infinite-dimensional space ℓ2\ell^2: if you only know how a physical quantity behaves along one fixed set of coordinate axes (the diagonal), is there only one honest way to extend that knowledge to the whole space? For forty-five years nobody could decide.

Nik Weaver found a way to shrink this abstract question down to something almost combinatorial: a purely finite-dimensional statement KS2KS_2 about splitting a pile of vectors into two well-balanced groups. Solving the small, concrete puzzle KS2KS_2 would settle the huge, abstract one.

state extends uniquely on B(ℓ2)  ⟺  KS2:∑ivivi∗=Id, ∥vi∥2≤δ  ⟹  ∃ S1,S2\text{state extends uniquely on } B(\ell^2) \iff KS_2: \sum_i v_iv_i^*=I_d,\ \|v_i\|^2\le\delta \implies \exists\, S_1,S_2
Detailed analysis

Kadison and Singer (1959) asked whether every pure state on the diagonal masa (maximal abelian subalgebra) of B(ℓ2)B(\ell^2) extends uniquely to a pure state on all of B(ℓ2)B(\ell^2). This is a question in operator algebra theory about how much information a "restricted" measurement determines about a full quantum-mechanical observable, and it resisted proof or disproof for decades.

Nik Weaver (2004) proved that the Kadison–Singer problem is logically equivalent to a family of finite-dimensional statements, the strongest of which is called KS2KS_2: given any collection of vectors v1,…,vmv_1,\ldots,v_m in a finite-dimensional space Cd\mathbb{C}^d summing to the identity, ∑ivivi∗=Id\sum_i v_iv_i^*=I_d, with each vector short, ∥vi∥2≤δ\|v_i\|^2\le\delta, one can always split the index set into two parts S1,S2S_1,S_2 so that the partial sums ∑i∈Sjvivi∗\sum_{i\in S_j}v_iv_i^* are bounded away from the full identity. Marcus, Spielman and Srivastava (2013, published in the Annals of Mathematics in 2015) set out to prove exactly this statement KS2KS_2.

This reduction is what makes the problem tractable: instead of reasoning about infinite-dimensional operator algebras and non-constructive objects like ultrafilters, the whole question becomes a concrete, checkable claim about splitting finitely many matrices — the object of study for the rest of this proof.

Terms in this step
Pure state
In operator algebra, a state is a way of assigning an "expected value" to every operator, consistent with the rules of quantum mechanics; a pure state is an extremal, indivisible such assignment, roughly analogous to a single definite physical configuration rather than a mixture of several.
Maximal abelian subalgebra (masa)
A subset of operators that all commute with each other (so they can be measured simultaneously) and that cannot be enlarged while keeping this property; the diagonal operators on ℓ2\ell^2 form one natural example.
Knowledge used in this step