MathLabs

Worked solution: Wantzel's algebraic impossibility proof via field extensions (1837)

Step 3 of 7: Multiplying degrees along the tower: Wantzel's criterion
In plain words

Degrees of field extensions multiply along a tower, much like exchange rates multiply along a chain of currency conversions: two steps that each double something combine to quadruple it. Since every single step in a construction tower is a doubling (or does nothing), the whole tower's total size is a power of two.

Any constructible number α\alpha sits somewhere inside such a tower, so the smallest field containing it, Q(α)\mathbb{Q}(\alpha), must have a size that divides a power of two — and a divisor of a power of two is itself a power of two.

[Fk:Q]=∏i=1k[Fi:Fi−1]=2k  ⟹  [Q(α):Q]=2m[F_k:\mathbb{Q}] = \prod_{i=1}^k [F_i:F_{i-1}] = 2^k \implies [\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}] = 2^m
Detailed analysis

By the tower law for field extensions, degrees multiply: [Fk:Q]=∏i=1k[Fi:Fi−1][F_k:\mathbb{Q}] = \prod_{i=1}^{k} [F_i:F_{i-1}]. Since Step 2 showed every factor is 11 or 22, this product equals 2k2^k for some integer k≥0k\ge 0 — a power of 22 regardless of how many construction steps were used.

Now suppose a real number α\alpha is constructible, so α∈Fk\alpha \in F_k for some such tower, hence Q(α)⊆Fk\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)\subseteq F_k. Applying the tower law again to Q⊂Q(α)⊂Fk\mathbb{Q}\subset\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)\subset F_k gives [Fk:Q]=[Fk:Q(α)]⋅[Q(α):Q][F_k:\mathbb{Q}] = [F_k:\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)]\cdot[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}], so [Q(α):Q][\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}] divides 2k2^k. The only divisors of a power of 22 are powers of 22, so [Q(α):Q]=2m[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}] = 2^m for some integer m≥0m\ge 0 (Wantzel 1837, §I).

This is Wantzel's necessary condition for constructibility, and it says nothing about sufficiency: an irreducible degree-44 polynomial with Galois group S4S_4, for instance, has roots of degree 4=224=2^2 that are still not constructible. What it does give is a sharp obstruction — if an equation's degree over Q\mathbb{Q} is not a power of 22, its roots are certainly not constructible, and that is exactly the tool the next steps apply to 60∘60^\circ.

Terms in this step
Tower law (multiplicativity of degree)
For a chain of fields F0⊂F1⊂F2F_0\subset F_1\subset F_2, the degrees multiply: [F2:F0]=[F2:F1]⋅[F1:F0][F_2:F_0]=[F_2:F_1]\cdot[F_1:F_0]. It lets a long chain of small extensions be measured all at once.
Knowledge used in this step
Common mistake. Degree 2m2^m over Q\mathbb{Q} is necessary but not sufficient for constructibility: an irreducible degree-44 polynomial can still have non-constructible roots if its Galois group is not built from repeated square roots.