MathLabs

Worked solution: Kahn–Kalai's disproof of Borsuk's conjecture via the Frankl–Wilson theorem

Step 1 of 7: Borsuk's 1933 conjecture: does f(d)=d+1f(d) = d+1?
In plain words

Cut a shape of a given width into a handful of smaller, strictly narrower pieces — like slicing a round pizza into wedges so no wedge is as wide across as the whole pizza. In the plane, three pieces always suffice for any shape; in space, four. Borsuk conjectured this pattern — one more piece than the number of dimensions — continues forever, and for sixty years everyone believed it, since it was known to hold for smooth, round shapes and for centrally symmetric ones in every dimension.

f(d):=min⁡{k:every set of diameter 1 in Rd splits into k sets of smaller diameter}f(d) := \min\{k : \text{every set of diameter } 1 \text{ in } \mathbb{R}^d \text{ splits into } k \text{ sets of smaller diameter}\}
Detailed analysis

Borsuk conjectured in 1933 that every bounded set S⊂RnS \subset \mathbb{R}^n can be partitioned into n+1n+1 pieces each of diameter strictly less than d(S)=max⁡x,y∈S∥x−y∥2d(S) = \max_{x,y \in S} \|x-y\|_2. The lower bound f(n)≥n+1f(n) \ge n+1 is easy (the vertices of a regular simplex, or a ball via the Borsuk–Ulam theorem, both need that many pieces); the conjecture was proved true in dimensions n=2n=2 and n=3n=3, and for all centrally symmetric or smooth convex bodies in every dimension, which is why it was widely believed.

Before Kahn and Kalai, several authors had suggested that a counterexample, if one existed, would come from combinatorics rather than smooth geometry. In 1965 Ludwig Danzer showed that a finite set of {0,1}\{0,1\}-vectors of a fixed weight cannot be covered by (1.003)d(1.003)^d balls of smaller diameter, a first hint that high-dimensional combinatorial configurations resist small partitions; Paul Erdős and David Larman independently floated the possibility of a genuine counterexample along these lines.

Terms in this step
diameter of a set
The largest distance ∥x−y∥2\|x-y\|_2 between any two points x,yx, y of a set SS; a partition into pieces 'of smaller diameter' means every piece's own largest internal distance is strictly less than that of the whole set.
centrally symmetric convex body
A convex shape SS with a centre point cc such that x∈Sx \in S implies 2c−x∈S2c - x \in S (the shape looks the same after a 180°180° rotation about cc), such as a ball, a cube, or an ellipse.
Knowledge used in this step