Worked solution: Kahn–Kalai's disproof of Borsuk's conjecture via the Frankl–Wilson theorem
Cut a shape of a given width into a handful of smaller, strictly narrower pieces — like slicing a round pizza into wedges so no wedge is as wide across as the whole pizza. In the plane, three pieces always suffice for any shape; in space, four. Borsuk conjectured this pattern — one more piece than the number of dimensions — continues forever, and for sixty years everyone believed it, since it was known to hold for smooth, round shapes and for centrally symmetric ones in every dimension.
Borsuk conjectured in 1933 that every bounded set can be partitioned into pieces each of diameter strictly less than . The lower bound is easy (the vertices of a regular simplex, or a ball via the Borsuk–Ulam theorem, both need that many pieces); the conjecture was proved true in dimensions and , and for all centrally symmetric or smooth convex bodies in every dimension, which is why it was widely believed.
Before Kahn and Kalai, several authors had suggested that a counterexample, if one existed, would come from combinatorics rather than smooth geometry. In 1965 Ludwig Danzer showed that a finite set of -vectors of a fixed weight cannot be covered by balls of smaller diameter, a first hint that high-dimensional combinatorial configurations resist small partitions; Paul Erdős and David Larman independently floated the possibility of a genuine counterexample along these lines.
- diameter of a set
- The largest distance between any two points of a set ; a partition into pieces 'of smaller diameter' means every piece's own largest internal distance is strictly less than that of the whole set.
- centrally symmetric convex body
- A convex shape with a centre point such that implies (the shape looks the same after a rotation about ), such as a ball, a cube, or an ellipse.