MathLabs

Bunkbed conjecture

Disproved, 2024Combinatorics and discrete mathematicsProbability and statistics
Statement

Let G=(V,E)G = (V, E) be a finite graph, and let its bunkbed graph be the Cartesian product G □ K2G \,\square\, K_2 consisting of two identical copies G0,G1G_0, G_1 of GG joined by vertical edges (v,0)(v,1)(v, 0)(v, 1) for vertices v∈T⊆Vv \in T \subseteq V. Under independent bond percolation on G0G_0 and G1G_1 with retention probability p∈(0,1)p \in (0, 1), the conjecture asserted that for every u,v∈Vu, v \in V, the probability that (u,0)(u, 0) is connected to (v,0)(v, 0) in the same layer is at least the probability that (u,0)(u, 0) is connected to (v,1)(v, 1) in the opposite layer.

In October 2024, Nikita Gladkov, Igor Pak, and Aleksandr Zimin disproved the bunkbed conjecture (`arXiv:2410.02545`, published in PNAS in 2025) by constructing an explicit planar counterexample graph with 7,2227,222 vertices and 14,44214,442 edges, building on Lawrence Hollom's 2024 counterexample for hypergraph percolation (`arXiv:2406.01790`). Their proof is purely analytical and does not rely on brute-force computer verification.

  1. Gladkov–Pak–Zimin's explicit counterexample disproving the bunkbed conjecture (2024)Nikita Gladkov, Igor Pak, Aleksandr Zimin, 2024Difficulty 4/5AdvancedCondensed summary

References

  1. Nikita Gladkov, Igor Pak, Aleksandr Zimin (2025). The bunkbed conjecture is false · DOI:10.1073/pnas.2420725122 · arXiv:2410.02545
  2. Jacob van den Berg, Jeff Kahn (2001). A remark on the Bunkbed Conjecture · DOI:10.1017/S096354830100482X