Worked solution: Gladkov–Pak–Zimin's explicit counterexample disproving the bunkbed conjecture (2024)
Build a bunkbed frame out of a graph : take two identical copies of , called level (bottom bunk) and level (top bunk), and at some chosen set of vertices , add a vertical "post" edge joining the bottom-bunk copy to the top-bunk copy. Now independently retain each edge of the two copies of with probability ; the posts are always retained. Ask: for two fixed vertices and of , is it at least as likely for the bottom copy of to be connected to the bottom copy of as it is for it to be connected to the top copy of ?
Pieter Kasteleyn conjectured in 1985 that the answer is always yes — staying on the same level should never hurt your chances of getting from one point to another. For nearly forty years, this felt so obviously true to probabilists that it was described as "self-evident", even though nobody could find a proof that covered every graph.
For a connected graph and a chosen subset of transversal vertices , the bunkbed graph consists of two copies and (levels and ) together with a post edge joining to for every . In bunkbed percolation, each edge of and is kept independently with probability , while every post is always kept. Kasteleyn's 1985 bunkbed conjecture (Gladkov, Pak & Zimin 2024, Conjecture 1.1, attributed to Kasteleyn via van den Berg & Kesten 2001, Remark 5) states that for every such , , and , and every pair of vertices , — connecting to 's own level is at least as likely as connecting to 's copy on the other level.
The most commonly cited special case takes (a post at every vertex), but the general statement with an arbitrary transversal set is what Gladkov, Pak, and Zimin actually address, and it is the version their counterexample refutes. The conjecture had been verified in several special cases — for wheels, complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, graphs with an automorphism swapping and , and for one or two transversal vertices — and, remarkably, in the limit , but a fully general proof or disproof had eluded probabilists for essentially the whole four decades since it was posed.
The rest of this proof builds an explicit graph, transversal set, and pair of vertices for which the inequality fails at , disproving the conjecture in general.
- Bernoulli bond percolation
- A random process on a graph in which each edge is independently kept ("open") with probability and removed ("closed") with probability , producing a random subgraph.
- Transversal vertex / post
- A vertex in the chosen set is called transversal; the edge joining its two copies and across levels is called a post, and posts are never randomly removed.