MathLabs

Worked solution: Dehn's invariant: the tetrahedron and cube are not scissors-congruent (1900)

Step 5 of 7: Prove the tetrahedron's dihedral angle is not a rational fraction of π\pi
In plain words

A regular tetrahedron's dihedral angle, arccos⁡(1/3)≈70.53°\arccos(1/3) \approx 70.53°, does not look like any nice fraction of a straight angle, and it isn't — but 'doesn't look like it' is not a proof. The trick is to repeatedly double (or otherwise multiply) the angle using the cosine addition formula and watch what happens to the denominator: every doubling multiplies the denominator by another factor of 33 without ever being able to cancel it, so the angle could never land back on a multiple of π\pi exactly, which is what a rational fraction would require.

θtet=arccos⁡ ⁣(13),cos⁡(nθtet)=an3n,  3∤an\theta_{\text{tet}} = \arccos\!\left(\tfrac13\right), \qquad \cos(n\theta_{\text{tet}}) = \frac{a_n}{3^n},\ \ 3 \nmid a_n
Detailed analysis

Let θ=arccos⁡(1/3)\theta = \arccos(1/3). By induction using the identity cos⁡((n+1)θ)=2cos⁡θcos⁡(nθ)−cos⁡((n−1)θ)\cos((n+1)\theta) = 2\cos\theta\cos(n\theta) - \cos((n-1)\theta), one shows cos⁡(nθ)=an/3n\cos(n\theta) = a_n/3^n for an integer ana_n with 3∤an3 \nmid a_n, for every n≥1n \ge 1: the base case a1=1a_1 = 1 is immediate, and the recurrence an+1=2an−9an−1a_{n+1} = 2a_n - 9a_{n-1} gives an+1≡2an(mod3)a_{n+1} \equiv 2a_n \pmod 3, which is never 00 when ana_n is not, since 22 is invertible modulo 33.

Now suppose, for contradiction, that θ/π=p/q\theta/\pi = p/q for integers p,qp, q with q≥1q \ge 1. Then qθ=pπq\theta = p\pi, so cos⁡(qθ)=cos⁡(pπ)=(−1)p=±1\cos(q\theta) = \cos(p\pi) = (-1)^p = \pm 1. But the lemma gives cos⁡(qθ)=aq/3q\cos(q\theta) = a_q/3^q with 3∤aq3 \nmid a_q, forcing aq=±3qa_q = \pm 3^q — an integer visibly divisible by 33 since q≥1q \ge 1, contradicting 3∤aq3 \nmid a_q. This contradiction shows θ/π\theta/\pi is irrational, i.e. [θ]≠0[\theta] \ne 0 in R/πQ\mathbb{R}/\pi\mathbb{Q}.

This argument (essentially the case cos⁡θ=1/3\cos\theta = 1/3 of what is now called Niven's theorem on rational values of trigonometric functions at rational multiples of π\pi) is exactly the missing piece needed to compute Dehn⁡\operatorname{Dehn} of a regular tetrahedron in the next step.

Terms in this step
Niven's theorem
A 1956 theorem of Ivan Niven stating that the only rational values of cos⁡θ\cos\theta for θ\theta a rational multiple of π\pi are 0,±12,±10, \pm\tfrac12, \pm1; since 1/31/3 is not in this list, arccos⁡(1/3)\arccos(1/3) cannot be a rational multiple of π\pi.
Knowledge used in this step