MathLabs

Worked solution: Lindemann's transcendence proof of $\pi$ settles squaring the circle (1882)

Step 4 of 6: Lindemann's theorem: eαe^\alpha is transcendental for every nonzero algebraic α\alpha
In plain words

Hermite's 1873 proof was really about one specific number, e=e1e=e^1. Lindemann's breakthrough in 1882 was realizing the auxiliary-integral machine could be rebuilt to work for any nonzero algebraic exponent α\alpha, not just the integer 11 — even a complicated number like iπi\pi, if π\pi were algebraic.

The technical difficulty is that an algebraic number like iπi\pi (under the false assumption) isn't rational, so Hermite's trick needs to be run simultaneously across all of the number's algebraic 'siblings' (its conjugates) to keep the final answer a whole number. Lindemann worked out exactly how to do this, and the resulting theorem instantly finishes off π\pi.

α≠0 algebraic  ⟹  eα is transcendental\alpha \ne 0 \text{ algebraic} \implies e^\alpha \text{ is transcendental}
Detailed analysis

Lindemann's 1882 paper 'Über die Zahl π\pi' proves: for every nonzero algebraic number α\alpha, the value eαe^\alpha is transcendental. This generalizes Hermite's 1873 result (the case α=1\alpha=1, giving e=e1e=e^1 transcendental) to arbitrary algebraic exponents, including complex ones.

The proof adapts Hermite's auxiliary-integral construction, but where Hermite worked with a single integer α=1\alpha=1, Lindemann must work simultaneously with α\alpha and all of its algebraic conjugates (the other roots of α\alpha's minimal polynomial), multiplying auxiliary integrals over the whole set so that the symmetric-function combinations appearing in the final estimate are guaranteed to be rational — a substantially harder bookkeeping problem that Lindemann resolved using elementary symmetric polynomials and the same two-sided estimate (forced nonzero integer vs. forced arbitrarily small) as Hermite's argument.

Applying this theorem to α=iπ\alpha=i\pi (assumed nonzero and algebraic in Step 3) gives immediately that eiπe^{i\pi} must be transcendental. But Step 3 also showed eiπ=−1e^{i\pi}=-1, which is algebraic — a direct contradiction. The only way out is that the assumption was false: π\pi is not algebraic, i.e. π\pi is transcendental (Lindemann 1882).

Terms in this step
Algebraic conjugate
Given an algebraic number α\alpha with minimal polynomial PP, its conjugates are the other roots of PP; together they form a set that is invariant (as a whole) under substitutions that preserve rational-number arithmetic, which is why symmetric combinations of conjugates are always rational.
Knowledge used in this step