Math Labs

Worked solution: Euler's proof via the sine product formula (1734–1735)

Step 1 of 6: The target sum and Euler's idea
In plain words

Imagine adding 11 plus 14\frac{1}{4} plus 19\frac{1}{9} plus 116\frac{1}{16} and so on forever: the terms shrink fast, so the total settles on one fixed number, yet nobody could name that number for almost a century. Euler's trick was to sneak up on the very same number from a completely different direction — through the trigonometric function sin⁡x\sin x — and read off its value by comparing two different descriptions of the same object.

ζ(2)=∑n=1∞1n2=1+14+19+116+⋯\zeta(2)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2}=1+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{9}+\frac{1}{16}+\cdots
Detailed analysis

The Basel problem asks for the closed form of ζ(2)=∑n=1∞1n2\zeta(2)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2}, posed by Pietro Mengoli in 1644 and unsuccessfully attacked by the Bernoullis and Leibniz. Convergence was never in doubt — the series is dominated by ∫1∞dx/x2\int_1^{\infty}dx/x^2, and by Euler's day roughly six correct digits were known — but an exact expression resisted every approach.

Euler's strategy, recounted step by step in Dunham's account (Ch. 3 of the source), is to obtain two different algebraic descriptions of the same function sin⁡xx\frac{\sin x}{x}: its Maclaurin series (Step 2) and an infinite product built from its zeros (Step 3). Once both expansions are on the table, equating them coefficient by coefficient converts information about the zeros of sin⁡x\sin x — pure geometry — into arithmetic information about ζ(2)\zeta(2).

The choice of sin⁡x\sin x is the creative act: it is the simplest entire function whose zeros form an explicit, evenly spaced, doubly infinite family 0,±π,±2π,…0,\pm\pi,\pm2\pi,\dots, exactly the kind of data needed for a product whose x2x^2-coefficient is a series of reciprocal squares.

Terms in this step
ζ(2)\zeta(2)
Standard shorthand for this particular infinite sum: the value at 22 of the Riemann zeta function ζ(s)=∑n=1∞1/ns\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty 1/n^s.
Closed form
An expression built from a finite number of familiar constants and operations, such as π2/6\pi^2/6, as opposed to an infinite, unevaluated process.
Knowledge used in this step